Thursday, December 13, 2012

Lab 8




          The Station Fire, which began towards the end of August 2009, is now recorded as one of the most devastating wildfires in California’s history. In total the fire burned about 160 acres of land and 89 homes. The Station Fire is currently considered to be the worst in Los Angeles’s recorded history in terms of the amount of land that was burned. The Station Fire occurred in a year in which other devastating wildfires caused significant damage in various parts of California. Notable fires in Southern California during 2009 include the La Brea Fire and the Morris Fire. It is interesting to note how many significant fires coincided with each other in one year. Even though fires, such as the Station Fire and La Brea Fire, were deemed to be acts of arson, it is important to inquire as to why the Station Fire and the other 2009 fires capitulated rapidly out of control, whereas many other wildfires do not react in a similar way. One approach is to consider the fuel, such as dry brush, that a wildfire requires for propagation. In particular, analyzing the amount and type of fuel available for the Station Fire to burn, produces plausible explanations as to why the Station Fire had a significantly more devastating effect in comparison to other wildfires.
            Firstly, it is important to consider the role of firefighters in the process of wildfires. In a way firefighters disturb the natural equilibrium that is present. Wildfires are a natural occurrence in the region of Southern California. For example, some plant species even use wildfires to aid in reproduction. When a wildfire is initiated it is propagated by the dead brush and vegetation that has accumulated in past years. This fuel is then removed and no longer poses further risk of accumulating and later burning, which may result in even larger fires. Firefighters, however, suppress fires in an attempt to protect property and areas of human habitation. Therefore, over the years this fuel accumulates and poses a risk of starting an even larger and uncontrollable fire. This in part explains the size of the Station Fire. The extent of the fire was multiplied in magnitude owing to all the accumulated fuel that the fire could access.
            It is also crucial to analyze the type of fuel available to the Station Fire, so that the devastating impact of the fire can be more accurately rationalized. It is beneficial to use a fuel map to visualize the different types of fuels available in the different areas of Los Angeles County. Fuel for fire is divided into four categories: grasses, brush, timber, and slash. Fuel models are obtained by determining the types of vegetation present in the overall mixture. A fuel model is useful, because it can be used to predict the behavior of a fire. Therefore, firefighters can predict how a fire will behave by knowing the types of vegetation it is burning. For example, grasslands and savannas would be deemed fit for fuel model 1. Fuel model 1 contains very sparse amounts of shrub or timber. The fire in a region containing such fuels is predicted to move rapidly and remain on the low surface of the grasses, since the vegetation within fuel model 1 is usually short. A fuel map is obtained by combining all the various fuel models present in a given area.
            Each fuel model uses mathematical calculations in order to approximate the behavior of the fire. The total fuel available in a fuel model is calculated by combining the amount of dead and alive fuel available in the region. The height of the fuel above the surface of the ground is then also taken into account. Also taken into account is the type or types of fuel present in the region. Therefore, some fuel models will result in more devastating fires than other fuel models. Additionally some fuel models will require for wind to be present to propagate and spread the flames, while in other fuel models the fire does not require significant wind presence.
           The fuel map for Los Angeles County has a variety of different fuel models. It is crucial to note that the predominant fuel model of the area in which the Station Fire burned is fuel model 4. A fire burning in material of fuel model 4 is predicted to be powerful, since it can consume the leafage of the plants and trees while also burning on the dead wood available. The fire also moves very quickly in this type of material. This dead wood is a major contributor in propagating the fire and making it powerful. The behavior of a fire in a fuel model 4 region is an accurate description of the Station Fire. The Station Fire was propelled onwards not only because it had significant amounts of fuel available, but also because of the type of fuel—dead timber—that it had available.
Works Cited

Anderson, Hal E. Aids to Determining Fuel Models For Estimating Fire Behavior. Rep. Utah:  

          United States Department of Agriculture, 1982. US Forest Service. Web. 13 Dec. 2012.

Scott, Joe H., and Robert E. Burgan. Standard Fire Behavior Fuel Models: A Comprehensive Set for 

          Use with Rothermel’s Surface Fire Spread Model. Rep. Colorado: United States Department of 

          Agriculture, 2005. Northwest Interagency Coordination Center. Web. 13 Dec. 2012.

Scott, Michon. "Station Fire Burn Scar : Natural Hazards." Station Fire Burn Scar : Natural  

         Hazards. NASA, 18 Sept. 2009. Web. 13 Dec. 2012.

"Station Fire Update Sept. 27, 2009." InciWeb. N.p., 27 Sept. 2009. Web. 13 Dec. 2012.
 
"Surface Fuels Maps and Data." Surface Fuels Maps and Data. State of California, n.d. Web. 13  

          Dec. 2012.